Corporate Tax: Beyond the Talking Points

September 22, 2011

We have all heard various arguments about the revenue we need for a jobs program. The President has proposed that the wealthiest individuals and corporations should pay somewhat more in order to help get our nation back on its feet. However, Republican opponents have adopted their newest talking point (“class warfare”) to discourage the American public from seeing the merits of this approach. In light of the ongoing exchanges, I wanted to shed some light on the facts. In my article, The Real Job Creators, I discussed in great detail the fairly minor impact that a top tax bracket increase would have on individual take home pay for those earning over $379,151. So, in this article, I wanted to give some much needed attention to corporate taxation.

Let’s start with some brain teaser questions:

1. Which of the following is true about corporate taxation over the last 75 years?
A. Corporate tax revenues have represented a greater proportion of our total federal revenue over time.
B. The proportion of revenue represented by corporate taxes has remained fairly stable during the last 75 years.
C. The proportion of revenue represented by corporate taxes has decreased, but only slightly.
D. The proportion of revenue represented by corporate taxes has decreased dramatically over the years.

2. Which of the following is true about individual income taxation?
A. Individual income tax revenues represent a continuously increasing percentage of total federal revenue.
B. Individual income tax revenues have fluctuated somewhat over time but have generally accounted for 40-50% of total federal revenue.
C. Individual income tax revenues have decreased consistently over time.
D. Individual income tax revenues are at their lowest levels in history.

From Major Contributor to Minor Stakeholder

From 1934 to 1943, corporations contributed more to total federal revenue than individuals. They were a true partner and substantial contributor to the federal budget. However, since that time, corporate tax revenue has represented less and less of our federal revenue. For example, in 1950, corporate taxes represented 26.4% of total federal revenue, but this proportion steadily decreased until the 1990’s. Corporate taxes currently account for only 8.8% of federal revenue.   (Source for all tax data, See Table 2.1) So the correct answer to question 1 is D.

Percentage of Total Revenue from Corporate Tax

When we examine the amount of corporate tax revenue in the context of all federal revenue, it is very apparent the amount of corporate taxes paid has not increased as some elected officials would lead us to believe. In this context, it is clear that corporate tax has become a much less significant contributor. The yellow dots on the graphic below represent the amount of corporate tax paid as part of the total federal revenue in the black circle.

Percentage of Total Revenue from Corporate Tax

Individual Income Taxation

In contrast, the amount of total revenue represented by individual income taxes has remained fairly consistent over time falling between 40 – 50% (which means the correct answer to question 2 is B). In recent years, the percentage has fallen to substantially lower levels (41.56% in 2010 compared to 49.59% in 2000) due to both the impact of the Bush tax cuts as well as our ongoing higher levels of unemployment.

Percentage of Total Revenue from Corporate Tax

Talking Point Reality Check

Another frequently used talking point is that “47% of Americans pay no income tax”. The implication is that these are all slackers riding on everyone else’s coat tails. However, in reality, there are many types of people in this 47%, including retirees drawing social security, individuals drawing disability benefits, spouses who do not work outside the home, unemployed individuals who are unable to find work, and wealthy individuals with talented accountants and tax attorneys.

Although it is true that some who qualify for earned income credit will receive an income tax refund for their withholdings, these individuals still contribute to federal revenue through social security and medicare withholdings. For example, a single person making $11,250 and a married couple with one child making $33,750 will qualify to get their income tax refunded. However, both households will pay 5.65% of their income for social security and medicare ($635.64 and $1902.92 yearly for each household). So it is incorrect to suggest that these individuals make no contribution to federal revenue.

Moreover, the individual making $11,250 would have a net pay of $821.11 monthly (in Kansas). Trying to pay for general monthly expenses (rent, utilities, gas, food, vehicle payment or maintenance, etc.) would be an overwhelming challenge. Allowing this person her $550 tax refund provides slightly over $45 extra per month. With gas prices where they are today, this is about one tank of gas for many folks. Clearly, these folks are not living high on the hog through earned income credits.

Where’s the Republican Outrage

We hear this talking point about individuals not paying taxes. But where is the equivalent outrage for corporations that do not pay taxes? When it comes to individuals, the focus is on making those who have the least contribute more. However, we lose billions of dollars of federal revenue when corporations don’t pay taxes. Why is it a travesty that the person in the example above gets a small refund while corporations avoid or dramatically lower their million or billion dollar tax burdens?

True Shared Responsibility

Let’s talk honestly about shared responsibility. Frankly, corporations are not pulling their weight. The contribution to total federal revenue is a pitiful 8.83%. Now some Republicans have the audacity to suggest that we should eliminate corporate taxes entirely!

Although some individuals imply that we should be grateful to corporations because they create jobs for the people, this is a distorted way of viewing the situation. In fact, corporations should be extraordinarily grateful that they have the privilege to operate in the U.S. market. As I discussed in my article, The Path to Economic Recovery, consumer spending is a primary economic driver and accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity. It is this spending that allows corporations to rake in huge profits. And, it is these profits that allows corporations to create jobs and grow their business.

Corporations should feel obligated to contribute to the society that is providing the vast majority of their profits and allowing them to have tremendous success. It is completely ridiculous to suggest that corporations who benefit the most from the American economy should not share in the financial responsibility to keep our country strong. We need to move toward true shared responsibility not reprehensible, selfish greed.

  • Alan

    Great points!  I shared it on Facebook with my Mormon Democrats group!

  • Randy

    Very good article and illustrations. I would like to discuss the corporate world according to Randy.  There was a point in time when the morning routine consisted of coffee, cigarette, and the financial section of the newspaper to see how my stocks performed yesterday.  In the early evening the question was what did our company stock do today?  Will our investors stay with us tomorrow or did someone signal a sell order?  That mindset has put company profits above everything else.  The easiest way to cut costs, so the company will be more profitable cutting labor, as labor is the only part of their business they have control of.  Vendors determine the cost of what is needed to run the business.  Competitors control what you can sell your product for.  The mindset is focused on lower labor costs, where many have resolved that problem by sending labor to other countries.  Now that labor costs are cut, what is next to cut?  Beginning in the 1980’s there was a novel idea of “Why don’t we cut cost by paying less taxes? Hey, that’s an innovative idea and it was made so.  To this day the mindset is cut, cut, cut.  There was also another idea that hasn’t caught on yet, that being more profitable by generating more gross revenue.  Creating More Revenue vs Cutting Costs makes no sense in corporate greed. When the corporate attitude changes to focus on making more gross income rather than looking at how to cut more costs .i.e. paying less taxes the world will change.  The public sector must also have an attitude change where generating more revenue, without the traditional method of increasing taxes, is more important than focusing on budget costs.  And yes, the state can raise more money without raising taxes.  I’ve seen it happen.  I’ve been a part of it.  Yet, budget cuts took these areas of profit and cut them too.  How foolish to cut what makes you money.  We must rid ourselves of traditional business practices and move to a higher level where the belief system is “All people are working for decent wages.”   Thank you for giving me the space to write this mini-book for venting for what I know can be true and knowing someone will read this wordy comment.